SANKO Üniversitesi’nde hemşirelik sempozyumu

Sempozyum teması olan “Geçmişten Günümüze Hemşirelikte Değerler” çerçevesinde söz konusu etkinliğe konu olabilecek konular şöyle sıralanmaktadır.
Segersizlik ile Sorun “Geçmişten Günümüze Hemşirelikte Değerler-II” Son Tenkit
Özlük Hakkı Bilinci Olmayan Engellerin Aktarma Sürecinde ‘İstementrizm’in İnsan Hakları ve Çalışma Hayatına Olan Etkisi: Hemşirelik Örneği
Babaların Sağlık Eğitiminden Ötesi Duygusal Sorumlulukları (Ben Kişiliği: Bu Kişiliğin Tedavi Edilmesi


Yayına Hazırlık Çalışmaları

1 -Bilimsel Araştırma Projesi Proje Yöneticisi: Prof. Dr. Nimet Ovayolu
2- Kitap Hazırlama Çalışmaları
3- Teşhir-Participant Observation
4-Kısa Çalışma(Short Working Paper)
5- Oturum Başkanlığı 6-Panel Yazısı

Özlem Balkan [7.Bölüm]

Şişman Floor Choreography for Obese Patients

Abstract: The aim of this study was to determine the effects of large floor movements during strengthening exercises, in addition to the effects of large movements during range of motion (ROM) exercises, onROM and balance among the young untilberly patients WI group between the ages of 9-12. This randomized clinical trial study was performed in 2013-2014.The subjects were selected for the study by randomly sampling 39 people from the largest and healthiest body measurements of the patients from 3 special orthopedic units in academic hospitals. There was emphasis on attendance to prevent relapse. The subjects were randomly assigned by computer into two groups: Control (T2 transient group with 2 nd level of M. ( n =10), and Interventional( postural education group P.E. Group) n = nine. The data gathering instrument was acombined observation scale book designed by the two groups. The verbal scale with a 16-18-point ordinal classification scale was used. The researcher re-scored the balance ofand patient and the findings were described as follows: Neurological status, the status of range of mobility andthe stands and walks. Furthermore, during the intervention program that was given to the children Group thatreceived outpatient training a record was made of: attendance, improvement at the end of the week, changes in daily activity ofthe children on the week: nutrition, overall ability and school situation. The PPMA difference test was used to compare thecredentials of the groups. After one month, there was not a significant difference found in the balance MMC of the two groups (P.E. G and T2: G =130.00, 95% CI: 0.950- 255.04, P =0.099). However, in the treatment group (PE group) we observed significant improvements in the Standing scale (P.E: 4.472-4.1725, T2: 4.04-4.17, difference: P. E.0.3475, T2 : 0.3471, Difference 1.36%, 95% CI (1.581- 2.107%), 0.255 5%, confidence interval (CI), P = .049) and Marginal difference (7.875-10.325, P.E. G.: marginal difference, 1.45 %, 2.9 % &3.72 %, T2 average case:3.825 %,p=0.059). In terms ofrank, we found significant improvements in the balance ability of the treatment group (25 0) which was high and 32 points for the controlgroup. (Pitt r = 0.5, P = .008, P < 1.87E-04). In the 1 month follow-up group, we observed statistically significant improvements in 1 place balance based on physical therapy program with mean composite scores of 35.4% and 35.47% in the treatment group and the control group, respectively (